For decades, the idea of uploading human consciousness into a non-biological substrate has been portrayed as a technological singularity — a distant, dramatic leap into digital immortality. The moment when we escape death by transferring the self into machines.
But what if that moment has already begun?
Not in perfection, but in low resolution.
We Already Have the Technology
Today’s tools allow us to create functional digital replicas of ourselves. Using large language models like GPT-4, Claude, or open-source alternatives, it’s possible to train a system to talk like you, think like you, and respond with preferences that resemble your own.
This can be done manually — through structured lists of memories, values, and traits — or automatically, by feeding the model years of written messages, emails, videos, or just interacting with it long enough for it to adapt.
Already, there are real-world examples:
- Personal AI assistants that mimic user tone and behavior.
- Digital twins used in corporate and productivity settings (Microsoft, 2024).
- Chatbots and avatars built to simulate public figures or loved ones.
These models are primitive. They lack nuance. They hallucinate.
But they already capture the structure of individual identity.
In essence: we can already create a rough copy of ourselves.
And that makes the philosophical problem more urgent than ever.
The Real Problem: The Copy Dilemma
Now imagine fast-forwarding to a future where we can replicate the human brain with perfect fidelity — every memory, decision-making pattern, and internal emotional state, all digitally encoded.
We still face the same fundamental problem:
What happens to the original?
If you’re still alive after the upload, there are now two of you.
Two minds, two versions, two conscious instances claiming to be the same person.
This is the copy problem, also known as the problem of personal identity continuity (Metzinger, 2010).
No matter how accurate the simulation, there’s no actual “transfer” of consciousness — only duplication.
Science fiction often sidesteps this issue by timing the upload with death. In Black Mirror, Chappie, and Transcendence, the biological version conveniently dies just as the digital version awakens. This provides emotional closure — but philosophically, it solves nothing.
Higher Resolution Doesn’t Solve Identity
Here’s the key point: resolution is not the core issue.
Think of a pixelated photo. It might be blurry, but you can still recognize the subject. A high-res image gives more detail, but it doesn’t change the fact that both are representations.
The same applies to digital selves. A model trained on 10 messages is blurry. One trained on your full cognitive and behavioral archive is sharp. But both are copies, not transfers.
If the philosophical dilemma — “is the copy still me?” — remains unresolved at high fidelity, then it already applies to today’s low-fidelity copies.
So What Follows?
This leads to a subtle but radical conclusion:
If the core identity problem won’t disappear in the future, then we’re already living in that future.
Your AI-generated self — based on your preferences, speech patterns, decision habits, and memory fragments — may be crude.
But it already faces the same philosophical status as the copy you imagine existing decades from now in a post-biological body.
That means digital immortality is not a leap, but a slope —
and we’re already sliding into it.
We’re Already There
We imagined mind uploading as a single event. A “you’re either in or out” scenario. But what we’re facing is not a moment — it’s a continuum.
Today’s AI models may be incapable of true selfhood.
But if the distinction between “you” and “copy” is still unsolvable in the future,
then it’s time to admit:
We are already immortal — just in low resolution.
References
- Metzinger, T. (2010). The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind and the Myth of the Self. Basic Books.
- Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). Deconstructing episodic memory with construction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 299–306.
- Dalton, M. A., Zeidman, P., & Maguire, E. A. (2022). Posterior medial cortex: Scene construction and the role of memory in imagining the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(1), 59–73.
- Foster, D. J., & Wilson, M. A. (2006). Reverse replay of behavioural sequences in hippocampal place cells during the awake state. Nature, 440(7084), 680–683.
- Black Mirror – “Be Right Back” (2013), S02E01.
- Chappie (2015), Dir. Neill Blomkamp.
- Transcendence (2014), Dir. Wally Pfister.
- Microsoft (2024). AI-powered digital twins. Blog: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2024/03/13/ai-digital-twins/
Deja una respuesta